I recently had a revelation about books. I can't read novels. I just can't do it. The last one I can remember reading all the way through was The Hobbit. I was only able to finish that because I was able to visualize all the characters based on the Lord of the Rings trilogy. I tried reading "Pillars of the Earth" and I stopped after roughly 100 pages because my desire to save myself 40 hours of time (900 more pages at ~25 pages/hour) was far greater than my desire to know what happens. So I find that novels are (for the most part) pointless and I'll explain why.
Too Much Time Spent
Jerry Seinfeld said it best when he described why he will never make movies. "You go to a bad movie, it's two hours; you're in a bad movie, it's two years." This is how I feel about reading novels. It takes far too long to tell a story that you could probably see on TV in two hours. I average about 2 pages every minute when I read. I know I'm not a super fast reader but a 200 page book would take me almost 7 hours to finish. And that's probably on the short side of most novels. I'm sure they average at least 300 pages. I'm just not willing to spend 7 hours of my life reading a story that would offer me no applicable benefits.
You Don't Learn Anything
I say this in comparison with books in which you do learn something. I'm sure if all you read were novels, you would develop over time a better vocabulary but that's really about it. Now by comparison, lets say that instead of spending 7 hours reading about Harry and Sally and their notebook they made in Rodanthe, you spent 7 hours reading about how our political system works? Or how to install kitchen cabinets? Or how to program in Ruby? Which would honestly be time better spent? I'm not saying a story can't be contained in a book where you are meant to learn something (like "A Million Miles in a Thousand Years"), as long as the book isn't dedicated to the story itself.
Entertainment Factor
A lot of people's response to my post here would be "But you like movies?! Isn't that just as pointless?" Yeah true, it's probably on par with being just as pointless, but why do people scoff when a movie is 3 hours long? It's because 3 hours is far too long to tell a story. But I think there is another difference between movies and novels. Movies entertain you without any effort on your part, but it takes effort in order for a novel to be entertaining. There is a certain amount of concentration that is required in order to digest the words on the page. I can't tell you the number of times my mind has wandered and I entirely missed a whole important page. That doesn't really happen with movies. When you watch a movie, you just have to sit back, relax, and enjoy the show.
I have to give a warning, the opinion of this post is *NOT* shared by Liz. She loves novels and reads them constantly and thinks my opinion is ridiculous. But I just can't do it. I'd say from this point forward, after this recent revelation, there is not a lot of novels I'd be willing to read.
The funny thing is about this post, for the longest time, one of my favorite books in the world was "Ender's Game", which is a novel. I can't imagine how amazing it would be as a movie, now THAT would be time well spent!
Posted by: Fulton | 3 comments